|
The
Iowa Great Lakes are known for their excellent fishing for Yellow Perch
and bluegill. In fact, in recent years new harvest records have been set.
For instance, the bluegill harvest during the 1991 fishing season on both
East and West Okoboji Lakes, were the highest ever recorded since 1957.
And the 1980's was the best and most consistent decade for fishing for
Yellow Perch in Spirit Lake. So what's the problem?
Well, in general, we receive more complaints about panfish when the
fishing is good, than when the fishing is fair, or even poor. When the
fishing is good, anglers see a lot of panfish being harvested and they
become very concerned about the potential overharvest of our panfish stocks.
The most common complaint we receive concerns "FISH HOGS". When
the fishing is good, anglers complain about Fish Hogs taking "Buckets
and Buckets of fish" from our lakes, and the perception is that these
Fish Hogs are significantly reducing the panfish populations.
The most common suggestion by anglers and fishing clubs are to implement
statewide bag limits to both reduce and spread out the harvest of panfish
to more anglers. Currently in Iowa, there is a 25 fish daily bag limit
on Yellow Perch and no bag limit restrictions on Bluegill and Crappie.
This generally leaves us with two questions. First, are "Fish Hogs"
significantly impacting our panfish populations?, and Second, are bag limits
effective tools for both reducing and spreading our the harvest of panfish
to more anglers?
To answer these questions we conducted extensive creel surveys on all
of these lakes. Completed trip information were obtained from boat, shore,
and ice anglers. Using this information, we were able to determine the
impact of Fish Hogs, and determine the effectiveness of various daily bag
limit scenarios.
The first thing we noted is that the vast majority of anglers fishing
for bluegill harvested less than 10 fish on each fishing trip, and only
a very small minority of anglers actually harvested more than 20 bluegill
one each trip spent on these lakes. This was even during the 1991 fishing
season which was the highest harvest of Bluegill ever recorded (since 1957)
on the Okoboji lakes. We documented the harvests of some fish hogs, for
instance, 2 anglers harvested 50 bluegill, one angler harvested 56 bluegill,
and another angler harvested 79 bluegill. But these anglers were definitely
the minority and the effect of these anglers were far outweighed by the
typical bluegill angler who harvested less than 10 bluegill on each fishing
trip. The 25 fish daily bag limit would have very little impact on the
total numbers of bluegill being harvested in these lakes. In fact, a 20
fish bag limit would reduce harvest, on average, by only 3%, a 15 fish
bag limit by only 8%, a 10 fish bag limit by only 17%, and a 5 fish daily
bag limit would only reduce harvest by only 39%.
We saw a similar trend for Yellow Perch in these lakes. Once again,
the vast majority yellow perch anglers harvested less than 10 yellow perch
on each fishing trip, and only a very small minority of anglers actually
harvested more than 20 Yellow Perch on each fishing trip. The bag limit
of 25 fish per day was affecting a very small percentage of the yellow
perch anglers, and this bag limit was having very little impact on the
total numbers of yellow perch being harvested in these lakes. In fact,
a 20 fish bag limit would reduce harvest by only 1%, a 15 fish bag limit
by only 4%, a 10 fish bag limit by only 11%, and a 5 fish daily bag limit
would only reduce harvest by 31%.
The fish hogs are having very little impact on the total numbers of
panfish being harvested from these lakes, and bag limits would not reduce
or spread out the harvest of bluegill to more anglers unless it was reduced
to only 5 fish per day. This drastic of a reduction in the daily bag limits
would not be acceptable to most anglers.
Panfish are cyclic and fluctuate in abundance every 3-5 years. These
cycles are due to environmental conditions and are not influenced much
by fishing pressure. The take home message is that even severe reductions
in the daily bag limits would not improve fishing over the long haul. The
environmental effects on panfish abundance far outweighs the effects of
anglers on these populations.
It is very expensive to implement new regulations such as bag limits
(new enforcement problems, evaluations, etc.), and we would receive very
little bang for our bucks in this case. Therefore, bag limits on panfish
is these lakes are not needed. Daily bag limits would only penalize a small
component of the angling public (the fish hogs), while not improving the
fishing for the typical panfish angler.
|